Some more sense offered for free…Why don’t we ever ask politicians the hard questions?

President Felipe Calderon of Mexico, the largest contributor of illegal aliens now living and working in America in the vicinity of 12 to 15 million, threw several nasty verbal rocks at Arizona for passing SB 1070.

His illegal Mexican citizens residing in the United States contribute $24 billion back to his financial coffers annually in cash transfers. At the same time, their lawlessness costs American taxpayers $346 billion yearly across 15 U.S. federal agencies.

Amazingly, Calderon and his countrymen cannot and will not provide jobs and a valid economy for Mexico’s own people. Additionally, his country transports and provides $75 billion in drugs that his cronies ship into the United States annually. It’s quite like a leper spreading his disease into his neighbor’s front yard! The USA proves an eager neighbor for drugs!

Both governments refuse to stop the people smuggling and drug smuggling at the border. A simple placement of 50,000 U.S. troops from Brownsville, Texas, across 1,952 miles to San Diego, would stop the illegal immigration and drug smuggling within 30 days.

Higher ups on both sides of the border enjoy enormous amounts of money; thus no action to stop drugs or people smuggling.

However, as illegals overran Arizona, that state instituted its own SB 1070 to mirror federal statutes. President Barack Obama chastised Arizona, but backed off when public opinion polls showed a solid 73 percent support from American citizens. Nonetheless, President Calderon lobbed a few verbal remarks last week at how ‘unfair’ and ‘un-neighborly’ Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer treats illegals.

“Every country has the right and duty to restrict the quality and quantity of foreign immigrants entering or living within its borders,” said journalist J. Michael Waller. “If American policymakers are looking for legal models on which to base new laws restricting immigration and expelling foreign lawbreakers, they have a handy guide: the Mexican constitution. The Mexican constitution segregates immigrants and naturalized citizens from native-born citizens by denying immigrants basic human rights that Mexican immigrants enjoy in the United States.”

The Mexican constitution: Unfriendly to immigrants

“The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country’s political life,” said Waller. “Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, “only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country.” Article 33 is unambiguous: “Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.”

The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized,” said Waller. “The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process.” Waller stated:

1. Mexico should amend its constitution to guarantee immigrants to Mexico the same rights it demands the United States give to immigrants from Mexico; or

2. The United States should impose the same restrictions on Mexican immigrants that Mexico imposes on American immigrants.

Unfortunately, we discover duplicity, scandal, corruption, deceit and immorality on both sides of the Mexican border with the United States. Both governments lie, cheat and steal on multiple levels. Both U.S. Republicans and Democrats fail their constituents at every juncture.

Whether Obama enforces our laws on this side of an amnesty or on the other side of an amnesty, he must enforce the laws. But then, he doesn’t enforce the laws today, so why would he enforce them tomorrow? The last four presidents failed to enforce U.S. immigration laws and none of the past Congresses enforced immigration laws. What will turn them around today? Nothing!

Americans need to vote 90 percent of Congressional incumbents out of their seats in November if this country ever hopes to secure its borders.



About limelite001

This is my tribute to highlighting the hyposcrisy in the left and racial world...

Posted on 21 May 2010, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Same big costs in The Netherlands…

    Immigrants cost the Netherlands 7.2 billion euros a year
    Posted on 20 May 2010 by Heleen Sittig

    The influx of non-Western immigrants is costing Dutch society 7.2 billion euros per year, research commissioned by anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders has shown. The research was carried out for his far-right Freedom Party by the Nyfer economic research unit.
    The researchers say that immigrants are relying more on public services and are paying less in taxes and premiums than the average native Dutch person. They also receive more social security payments and are often on inability or unemployment benefit. Other costs are incurred by the over-representation of immigrants in crime.

    Mr Wilders says the research results are shocking. The subject is a hobbyhorse of the right-wing populist leader. Last year, he asked the cabinet for a calculation of the costs of immigration. The then integration minister, Eberhard van der Laan, whose Labour Party has since left the government, refused to give Mr Wilders the information. The Freedom Party leader then commissioned the Nyfer bureau research.

    Mr Wilders says he is glad that tax payers are at long last being given an insight into what happens to their money. He claims that the Nyfer figures confirm the need for measures proposed by his party, such as stopping immigration from Islamic countries and restricting immigration from elsewhere.

    Not economic goods
    Labour leader Job Cohen has responded by saying he would “never take the costs of a human being, whether immigrant or native, as a starting point for any policies”. He says Mr Wilders is “once again demonstrating that he is in favour of a totally different kind of country”. The Labour leader says he wants the Netherlands to be a country “where it's not your origins that matter, but rather your future”.

    A similar response came from the leader of the D66 democrats, Alexander Pechtold, one of Mr Wilders' fiercest opponents. Mr Pechtold believes that “people are not economic goods with a profit-and-loss account”.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: