Legal Defeat For Global Warming In Kiwigate Scandal

In the climate controversy dubbed Kiwigate, New Zealand skeptics inflicted a shock courtroom defeat on climatologists implicated in temperature data fraud. So, we have some climate “scientists” tampering with data and making some “bold adjustments” to the recorded temperature readings so that they reported what they wanted people to believe – that there was a significant warming of the earth. Oops, seems like they got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Some clever people took them to court to expose their lies. And now we find out that the head “tamperer” is none other than Jim Salinger who is also a lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – you know, that scientific body that is so corrupt and fraudulent… Salinger was also exposed during “climategate” as having written emails saying that he was concerned about deniers and their beliefs. Yes, you know, us deniers, we’re just a bunch of ignorants. I mean, how dare we actually question wonky science?
 

 
New Zealand’s government via its National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) has announced it has nothing to do with the country’s “official” climate record in what commentators are calling a capitulation from the tainted climate reconstruction.
 
NIWA’s statement claims they were never responsible for the national temperature record (NZTR).The climb down is seen as a dramatic legal triumph for skeptics of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition (NZCSC) who had initiated their challenge last August when petitioning the high court of New Zealand to invalidate the weather service’s reconstruction of antipodean temperatures.
 
According to NZCSC, climate scientists cooked the books by using the same alleged ‘trick’ employed by British and American doomsaying scientists. This involves subtly imposing a warming bias during what is known as the ‘homogenisation’ process that occurs when climate data needs to be adjusted.
 
The specific charge brought against the Kiwi government was that it’s climate scientists had taken the raw temperature records of the country and then adjusted them artificially with the result that a steeper warming trend was created than would otherwise exist by examination of the raw data alone.
 
Indeed, the original Kiwi records shows no warming during the 20th century, but after government sponsored climatologists had manipulated the data a warming trend of 1C appeared.

New Zealand Government Abandons ‘Official’ Climate Record

The NZCSC story reports that the NZ authorities, “formally stated that, in their opinion, they are not required to use the best available information nor to apply the best scientific practices and techniques available at any given time. They don’t think that forms any part of their statutory obligation to pursue “excellence.”

NIWA now denies there was any such thing as an “official” NZ Temperature Record, although there was an official acronym for it (NZTR). However, the position now taken by the NZ government is that all such records are now to be deemed as unofficial and strictly for internal research purposes.

The article urges that if the government will not affirm that their temperature reconstruction is official then, “Nobody else should rely on it.”

Researcher from Climategate University Implicated in Data Fraud

As reported in a Suite101 article by the same writer of April 2010 ‘Kiwigate is a Carbon Copy of Climategate’ it was shown that the scientist who made the controversial “bold adjustments” is none other than Jim Salinger who is also a lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Salinger was dismissed by NIWA earlier this year for speaking without authorization to the media. The discredited researcher originally worked at Britain’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), the institution at the center of the Climategate scandal.

Salinger was also among the inner circle of climate scientists whose leaked emails precipitated the original climate controversy in November 2009. In an email (August 4, 2003) to fellow disgraced American climate professor, Michael Mann, Salinger stated he was “extremely concerned about academic standards” among climate skeptics.

Bogus Data Destroyed before it could be independently verified

In circumstances strangely similar to those witnessed in the Climategate controversy Kiwigate appears to match Climategate in three key three facets. First, climate scientists declined to submit their data for independent analysis. Second, when backed into a corner the scientists claimed their adjustments had been ‘lost’. Third, the raw data itself proves no warming trend.

Source

Advertisements

About limelite001

This is my tribute to highlighting the hyposcrisy in the left and racial world...

Posted on 8 October 2010, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. I doubt this will make little difference to the BBC, they appear to have a religious like devotion to the global warming theory.
    Its a bit like telling a Jihadist Islam is all wrong.

  2. @reveal1970 – Agree – here in Oz our PM and her Green coalition are pushing like crazy for a carbon tax or carbon trading system. They won't listen to anyone other than like-minded people. I have never heard any global warming deniers being given any airtime. It's a huge scam and they're trying to whip the people into a frenzy about the imminent demise of the world. It was ruled the greatest moral challenge of our time – yet 2 years later and we're still here and they still haven't managed to get their communist tax passed. It will happen though…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: